The banana shape greatly helps penetration into the ice and at the same time allows excellent traction. The Chacal blade had a complete set of teeth up to the shaft, but it also had some limitations: the first was its length, greater than Terrodactyl, but still too short to protect the climber's fingers, the second that the curvature was minimal and it was difficult to swing it in the ice and, once it was in, it was very difficult to extract it, the third that the thickness of the blade was too high and the material with which it was made was rather fragile, breaking frequently especially if used in torsion.
In the early s, Grivel took a step forward in this evolution with the Super Courmayeur , a system of interchangeable blades and accessories on the shafts. The system also includes the first forged, banana-shaped, interchangeable blade. The forging process makes it possible to make thinner blades that break the ice less and enter more easily. They are less fragile and for the first time the curve of the banana is pushed to facilitate insertion and the blade is also lengthened by a few centimeters.
Special care was also reserved for ease of extraction by increasing the curvature of the upper part of the blade and increasing the upper sharpening.
Belays were often made on ice axes screws were almost always the weak link in the system , which is why Grivel invented a blade with a very high top so that it can be hammered deeply using the hammer to create a secure anchor point. Between the end of the 80s and the 90s, ice climbing evolved very rapidly, as did the equipment. The shafts begin to curve but this is another story In the early 90s the blades were mostly flat or only with a slight central excavation, slightly longer than the reference Chacal, with homogeneous teeth half-moons which already represented the best compromise between holding and extraction.
The Evolution was truly an "extreme" ice blade with a very elongated banana shape that was also called "proboscis", very low at the tip and very thin in the tip area for optimal penetration without breaking the ice. The tip was very low and very inclined, while the very short teeth at the tip gradually increased in height.
The Face Nord blade was instead more all-round, shorter and thicker with less aggressive teeth and therefore more suitable for "heavy" use for mountain climbs e. In , the Evolution blade was further excavated and lightened, in the meantime a new intermediate Goulottes blade was presented, thinner than the North Face, but shorter and higher than the Evolution. The latter remained the top, of a truly unique design, characterized by a clear change of curvature in the tip area to facilitate the insertion as much as possible: this point also became the critical point of the peck and often the blade bent without breaking however and could be straightened back.
Shortly afterwards, the tubular blade was added, with the aim of breaking the ice less, and which worked well especially on porous ice. Scholars have wrestled with identifying a progression of stone tool technology since the " Stone Age " was first proposed by C. Thomsen back in the early 19th century. Cambridge archaeologist Grahame Clark, [] came up with a workable system in , when he published a progressive "mode" of tool types, a classification system that is still in use today.
John J. Shea , , , arguing that long-standing named stone tool industries are proving obstacles to understanding evolutionary relationships among Pleistocene hominids, has proposed a more nuanced set of lithic modes. Shea's matrix has yet to be broadly adopted, but in my opinion, it is an enlightening way to think about the progression of the complexity of stone tool making.
Science Clark, G. World Prehistory: A New Synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shea, John J. Shea JJ. Sink the Mousterian? Quaternary International 0 Company About Us. What We Offer.
Visit Us. Custom Manufacturing. Social Responsibility. Advanced Ceramics. Properly Use Diamond Tools. Select right Diamond Blade. Properly Use Diamond Blades.
Diamond Blade Guide. Select Right Drill. Property Use Diamond Drills. Diamond Drill Guide. Metal Bond. Diamond Dicing Blades. Diamond Blades. Wafering Blades. Diamond Drills. Diamond Wheels. Diamond Laps. Band Saw Blades. Other Diamond Products. Diamond Tool Accessories. Not only that, researchers in one area might use one name for one set of tools, in another area the same name might be used for a somewhat different group, thus leading to confusion and muddling. In the s, Grahame Clark attempted to make sense of the evolution of stone tools globally, and devised a system based on five lithic modes, based primarily on European stone tools but applied worldwide, that demonstrated the evolution of stone tools from simple to complex.
The stone tool technology five modes, devised by Grahame Clark Clark, ; Shea, , were:. Mode 2 Characteristics: Large bifacial cutting tools made from flakes and cores Time period: Lower Paleolithic later Representative industries from Western Europe: Abbevillian, Acheulian.
Mode 4 Characteristics: Punch-struck prismatic blades retouched into various specialized forms Time period: Upper Paleolithic Representative industries from Western Europe: Aurignacian, Gravettian, Solutrean. Also, the modes are divided into groupings based on aspects of morphology of the stone tools, but not on how they were made; the categories are sometimes too broad, and sometimes too specific Shea, Shea Shea, attempted to overcome these limitations, and has devised a lithic mode scheme with nine main groups along with eight sub-groups, giving a total of This increase from 5 to 17 modes highlights the complexity see in the archaeological record.
Mode B Bipolar cores — pebbles or cobbles that have been knapped by striking the rock on top with another rock, thus fracturing it multiple pieces. Cores conventionally described as choppers, chopping tools, discoids, and polyhedrons are pebble cores.
0コメント